Nike Structure 26 Review – Stability Moves Forward, but Is It Enough?
- FORDY RUNS
- Jul 22
- 3 min read
The Nike Structure 26 represents a significant shift in Nike’s approach to stability shoes. As part of their updated running shoe silos—alongside the Pegasus and Vomero—the Structure 26 arrives as a mild support daily trainer aimed at runners who want a little extra stability without compromising on comfort or responsiveness.
So, does the Structure 26 hold its own against tough competition? Let’s break it down.
What’s New?
Nike has given the Structure 26 a complete overhaul from previous versions. Here are the key updates:
Full-length ReactX midsole (13% more responsive than standard React foam)
No Air Zoom unit in the forefoot (removed entirely)
Medial and lateral midfoot support system
Slightly higher stack height – 38mm in the heel, 28mm in the forefoot (10mm drop)
Dual rubber outsole – flexible blown rubber in the forefoot, durable high-abrasion rubber in the heel
New mesh upper with better breathability and strategically placed overlays
Weight: Over 310g in UK 9.5
Fit-wise, it’s true to size, with a wide toe box and plenty of heel structure. It’s a big shoe, no doubt—but one built for comfort and control.
How It Performs
I've put about six runs into the Structure 26, mostly easy daily mileage in the 4–5 mile range. My first impressions? The shoe gets better with time. The ReactX foam felt noticeably softer and more responsive after the third or fourth run. It’s not overly mushy, nor is it unstable—Nike seems to have found a good balance here. It delivers a smooth, cushioned ride that gets better as it breaks in. Traction is solid, and I particularly appreciated the comfort from the wider base and foam-heavy heel. The midfoot support system works subtly but effectively—offering stability without the plastic intrusion you might find in older stability shoes. For someone like me who mildly pronates, especially on my left side, the support feels noticeable—but not aggressive.
How It Compares
Here’s how the Structure 26 stacks up against other mild stability options:
Puma ForeverRun Nitro 2 - This is the standout in the category. The Nitro foam feels more alive and responsive than ReactX. The support is built-in but not intrusive—it just runs like a great daily trainer.
New Balance Vongo v5 - A solid middle ground. Less exciting than the Puma, but evenly matched with the Structure. Comes down to preference.
Saucony Guide 18 - Lighter on foot than the Structure, but let down by the outdated PWRRUN foam, which feels flat compared to ReactX. Still, a good option if you prefer a lighter shoe.
The Structure holds its own—especially with its improved ride and comfort—but it’s heavy, and that might be a dealbreaker for some.
What I Liked
Comfortable, especially in the heel
Wide toe box and stable platform
Improved ReactX foam delivers a softer ride
Looks a bit like an Air Max (in a good way!)
Good grip and lockdown
What Could Be Better
Weight – At over 310g, it’s heavy for a daily trainer
Stability can feel intrusive if you don’t need much correction
Could be more responsive compared to some competitors
